INCONTROL Community

Ha Bob,

That is the result of the shortest path algorithm. What you perhaps can do is to make the returning connection a one-way option. That is changing the network, thereby forcing the AT over the route you have in mind.

I hope this helps you further,

Regards,

Harry

Here I'm not fully understanding what you want to see. The Entry trigger is triggered as soon as a product arrived in the server and the server has accepted the product. The Exit trigger is going off as soon as the product left the server (this can be later than the CycleTime when the conveyor/queue...

Ha Louise, Yes, you can first do this on the Exit trigger, since only there you officially know how long a product was in a server. That requirement I overlooked, sorry. The staying time is a combination of Setup-time, cycle-time and, when applicable, failure-time. Since the cycle-time is first defi...

Ha Louise,

You could try: "Time - EntryTime", where "EntryTime" gives the time that a product entered another atom and the use of "time" you already found

Success,

Harry

Ha jastesem, I have the impression, when I see the model, that we are making it a bit too complicated. You said in the beginning that one Advanced Transporter is dedicated to delivering the first step and one for the second step? In that case, you must ensure that the products with label([Step] = 1 ...

Ha jastesem,

In which version of ED are you working?

Regards,

Harry

Ha jastesem,

Can you share your model so I can have a look at it?

Regards,

Harry

This issue was in the end handled via a different medium.

It was not able to reproduce this issue on another computer. In the end, 2 extra rows were read from Excel and the problem was gone.

Ha jastesem, What you can do is create a table (ServerCapacity) with 3 rows (one for each server) and the moment a product is picked up to be brought to a server, the corresponding cell is incremented. And only once a product leaves the server, the cell is decremented again. Additionally, you can cr...

Ha Louise,

Have you already tried to arrange this by setting a capacity on the nodes?

Greetings,

Harry